back in 1989 and 1990 I planted seeds from a 75 year old bonzi tree. to this day I don't know what species of tree I have. the mother plant gave little red berries similar to cherries but smaller. unfortunately the mother plant was lost to rot.

What country are you in? From this distance in the picture it could be a Hawthorn, but it is difficult to tell. Is it spiney? I think it could make a nice bonsai in years to come, but I would plant it in the ground to get a thicker trunk for a few years.

Yes, I agree with Geoff. Due to the fact that produces red berries and the look of the leaves I´m leaning to believe that Hawthorn it´s the right choice. However it would be nice to take a closer look to the leaves. One question... Which was the color the flowers bloomed?
Oh...and I´m posting a picture of the flowers, the leaves and the fruits so you can compare it and let us know if we are right.

Alain

i would say it is an ash tree, i could be wrong, hawthorn? the leaves are not hawthorn.

Hi Jaimin,

It might not be a hawthorn, that's a possibility. However, it is certainly not an ash tree. You'll see, the fruit of the ash tree is called "samara". A samara, as Wikipedia defines it, is: "A winged achene, a type of fruit in which a flattened wing of fibrous, papery tissue develops from the ovary wall. A samara is a simple dry fruit and indehiscent (not opening along a seam)." So, I would say this tree it is not an ash tree as red berries differ widely from samaras.

Alain

thank you alain for helping me realize that, i just had a theory/suggestion and it is right outside my flat:a rowan tree. it has red berries and the same foliage.

Well, that species is a much better guess. Certainly the fruits and leaves seem to match those of the original pictures. So, a rowan tree might be indeed. Well done Jaimin,

here are some snap shots of the leaves and trunk
I never go to see the blooms on the mother plant